Canadian doctors one of Canada’s fastest growing health costs

| December 12, 2011 | 0 Comments

Troy Media – by Livio Di Matteo

The recent release of National Health Expenditure Trends by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) puts total health expenditure in Canada at a whopping $192.9 billion in 2010 and $200.5 billion in 2011 – annual increases of 5.9 and four per cent respectively.

This year’s release was also accompanied by a report titled Health Care Cost Drivers, which finds the period from 1998 to 2008 was one in which public health care spending grew at an average of 7.4 per cent annually – double the rate of government revenue.

Physician, heal thyself

Physician spending was highlighted as one of the fastest-growing public-sector health categories of recent years, with half of the growth attributable to increases in physician fee schedules.

Economists are not surprised that physicians were able to negotiate generous fee increases, given the general perception of physician shortages. However, it should be noted that the period since 2003 has seen a marked increase in the number of physicians after a period of relative stability, due largely to sharply higher medical-school enrollment.

The average number of physicians per 10,000 people in Canada is now rising markedly in most provinces after the small decline of the 1990s.

Governments are often conflicted when it comes to public health care. While more physicians means more services and access for the public, it also means more public spending. With health care sustainability once again moving into the forefront of policy discussion in Canada, physicians and their role as health-system gatekeepers will be coming under scrutiny.

If we are going to spend more on physician services, we need to ensure that we can measure outcomes and assess whether we are getting better care.

Indeed the cost and effectiveness of many procedures will likely be an area of examination. As well, we can expect to see even more pressure to move away from fee for service models of physician reimbursement and towards models that pay physicians set salaries or fixed payments per enrolled patient – though there is no certainty that these will help control costs.

There is surprisingly little evidence on whether or not alternate payment systems for physicians generate large differences in health care costs and health outcomes.

One of the arguments used to restrict medical-school admissions in Canada in the early 1990s was that physicians were a primary cost driver in the health system because of their role as gatekeepers. Reduce the number of physicians and replace them with nurse-practitioner teams and it was felt cost savings would automatically ensue.

However, the 1990s saw a perception of widespread physician shortages though only a handful of provinces had declines in the per capita number of physicians (Ontario, BC, Alberta, PEI and Nova Scotia), and by 2010 these declines have turned into marked increases in most of these provinces.

Moreover, after a short pause, health-care spending still continued to mount, driven also by drugs, diagnostic technology and public-health initiatives. The recent increase in physician numbers more than makes up for the small decline of the 1990s but is being accompanied by expenditure increases.

While physician spending is an important cost driver, the drivers of public health-care spending are also a complex interaction between physician decision-making, new diagnostic and drug technologies, population growth and aging, and the cost and deployment of other health human resources used in treatment.

Indeed, a positive correlation between physician numbers and health spending is not automatic. In other words, a high per capita number of physicians is not always associated with high per capita health spending. Quebec, for example spends the lowest amount per capita on public health care spending and yet has one of the highest number of physicians per capita. Manitoba, on the other hand has the second highest per capita public health spending in the country but is one of the lowest in terms of physicians per capita.

Health care spending complex

Two lessons emerge from this. First, public health-care spending is complex and care needs to be taken that cost-control approaches to health-system sustainability use a balanced approach rather than setting simplistic goals that target only one aspect of the health care system. Although physicians are a health cost-driver, they are not alone but operate as part of a system that also drives costs.

Second, the federal government needs to coordinate information sharing and exchange amongst the provinces so that they can learn from each other on a best practice basis how to balance any increases in physician numbers and access to services with measures to keep health spending costs under control.

Livio Di Matteo is an Expert Advisor with EvidenceNetwork.ca, a comprehensive and non-partisan online resource designed to help journalists covering health policy issues in Canada. He is also a professor of economics at Lakehead University.

 

Related Posts SliderRelated Stories
Want to know what Canada’s health care system costs you?
Troy Media - by Nadeem Esmail and Milagros Palacios The true cost of Medicare for individuals and families in Canada is often misunderstood, with many people thinking it’s either free or ...
Read More
Want to know what Canada’s health care system costs you?
Troy Media - by Nadeem Esmail and Milagros Palacios The true cost of Medicare for individuals and families in Canada is often misunderstood, with many people thinking it’s either free or ...
Read More
Fraser Institue: National health spending crunch not fault of drug costs
A new report by the Fraser Institute dispels claims that prescription drug costs are at the root of Canada's health spending crisis.   "There's no evidence linking the unsustainable growth of government ...
Read More
  Reduced operating room availability and changes in patient case loads are two of the most commonly reported factors behind increased wait times for medical care and surgical procedures, concludes a new ...
Read More
Canada’s health care system is affordable
Troy Media - by Dr. Michael Rachlis Recently the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) released the latest figures on the country’s health spending. It provides a cool analytic antidote to ...
Read More
The unhealthy consequences of the Canada Health Act
Troy Media - by Mark Rovere and Brett J. Skinner When provincial and territorial health ministers recently met in Halifax to discuss the 2004 federal-provincial-territorial agreement on health transfers, which is ...
Read More
What the rest of Canada can learn from B.C. about health care
Troy Media - By Garey Mazowita and Marcus Hollander Recently hundreds of people lined up for hours outside a new medical clinic near Ottawa, all hoping to get a family doctor. Those ...
Read More
Grey tsunami threatening health care is a myth
Troy Media - by Kimberlyn McGrail You’ve heard it before: the boomers are aging and jeopardizing our health care system by the sheer number of them swanning into their golden years. ...
Read More
Want to know what Canada’s health care system
Want to know what Canada’s health care system
Fraser Institue: National health spending crunch not fault
Doctors survey: Lack of operating room time reason
Canada’s health care system is affordable
The unhealthy consequences of the Canada Health Act
What the rest of Canada can learn from
Grey tsunami threatening health care is a myth

Tags:

Category: Health

About the Author (Author Profile)

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>