Canadian oil sands – Geothermal could lower greenhouse gas emissions

| August 24, 2013 | 1 Comment
canadian oil sands

Helmholtz-Alberta Initiative—a collaboration between the U of A and the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres. Photo: University of Alberta.

Canada-Germany research collaboration on using geothermal in Canadian oil sands

Could geothermal heat hold the key to reducing greenhouse emissions in the Canadian oil sands? Two University of Alberta researchers think so.

 

canadian oil sands

University of Alberta researcher Martyn Unsworth. Photo: University of Alberta.

Martyn Unsworth and Inga Moeck are exploring the potential of using geothermal energy to generate power for the Canadian oil sands region.

Currently, natural gas is used to heat water for Canadian oil sands bitumen processing, which accounts for about six per cent of total Canadian consumption. Eliminating natural gas consumption could both lower costs for industry and reduce greenhouse emissions.

Because geothermal resources (warm rock and hot water) in northern Alberta are much deeper in the Earth than in naturally volcanic regions, Unsworth and Moeck are proposing an “enhanced geothermal system,” or EGS. This technique involves fracturing the rock and pumping water through to harness the heat—demonstrating that fracking can also be used for green purposes.

“We’ve had so many requests from companies that want to develop and use EGS in Alberta,” said Unsworth. “They want to generate geothermal energy but they don’t have the expertise.”

“Even if the heat we extract isn’t sufficient for energy generation, we can still use that hot water for direct use in heating.”

canadian oil sands

German researcher Inga Moeck. Photo: University of Alberta.

“In Alberta, geothermal is really intriguing for this reason,” said Moeck. “Energy companies use water to flush out oil, and hot water comes out of the well. This tie-in between the conventional energy industry and geothermal potential is a magic thing and is unique to Alberta.”

So far, though, EGS has not proven to be economically viable for the oilsands, mostly because of depressed natural gas prices.

“EGS is nearly economic, but not quite,” says Unsworth. “If natural gas prices rise again, or if we ever get a realistic carbon tax, geothermal energy will have an edge.”

Moeck is splitting her time between Potsdam and Edmonton, but will be in Alberta most of the time in the coming years after receiving a new Campus Alberta Innovates Program Chair in Enhanced Geothermal Energy Systems at the U of A.

“There are lots of benefits that I bring from Germany,” she says. “Geothermal is more advanced there, and there is a lot of experience that we can input into our research here.”

Unsworth, jointly appointed to the departments of physics and Earth and atmospheric sciences, is an expert in natural geothermal exploration, with years of experience working with volcanoes in Latin America and around the world. Moeck’s expertise is in geothermal energy production.

Together, they are working under the umbrella of the Helmholtz-Alberta Initiative—a collaboration between the U of A and the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres, Germany’s premier scientific institute.

So far, Unsworth and Moeck have spent three years trying to determine whether geothermal energy can benefit the oilsands, with plans for another five years of collaboration. To date, they have mapped geothermal potential in the Fort McMurray area and in the Peace River oilsands region.

Alberta residents, tell us what you think of the Canadian oil sands by filling out this brief survey

 

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Category: Energy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Tell your Story