Tell your Story  

My lawn mower and zero emissions

| June 7, 2012 | 0 Comments

Just because energy is cleaner, don’t wastefully use more of it

Calgary-based Matt Palmer is a film maker with a keen interest in energy and the environment.

By Matt Palmer         

My lawn mower died on Monday. It was a reliable workhorse for eight years, until while using it Monday, I began to smell something burning, then a while later, the motor died. I have to admit, I was a little happy because I wanted to buy a cordless mower. We have a reasonable size yard, and the cord is a pain, but I was willing to put up with the current model until the end of its life cycle.

Off I went to Home Depot to look for a new mower. After some discussion with the sales rep, I settled on buying another Black and Decker model, but this time a battery-powered cordless. As the sales guy pulled the box off the shelf and put it on my cart, I noticed a big badge on the top of box claiming that the mower operates with zero emissions! While on the surface this sounds great, I immediately felt that the claim was misleading.

When I got home I went to the Black and Decker website to do a little research to find the basis for this zero emissions claim. I do not like gasoline powered mowers or trimmers, mostly because of the need to have canisters of gasoline in the garage, and the potential for spills. I found some startling statistics on the Black and Decker website.

 

 

The EPA reports that a gas powered lawnmower emits as much air pollution in one hour as driving a car for 100 miles, which is significant with more than 30 million lawnmowers in the United States. A gas powered string trimmer emits as much air pollution in one hour as driving a car for eight hours. 

Staggering! So clearly, the push to get people away from gas-powered lawn tools can make a serious contribution to reducing air pollution. But what about the zero emissions claim? Again from their website:

When it comes to caring for your lawn. Black & Decker electric and cordless products get yard work done, without emitting harmful gas emissions into the air and environment. No pull cords. No trips to the gas station. No gas to store or spill. No fumes. No tune-ups. And most importantly, ZERO EMISSIONS IN YOUR YARD. Just blue skies and green lawns.

Okay, so clearly if you switch from a gas-powered lawnmower to a battery operated one, the actual operation of the mower in your yard would produce no emissions. I buy that. There is one problem. You have to charge the battery. We could also talk about the emissions created from producing the mower, and we could ask the average consumer if they make that connection. But once the mower is made and purchased, is it truly zero emissions?

It all comes down to where your energy comes from. If you have solar panels on your roof, or buy your electricity from a company producing wind, nuclear or hydro, then yes, the lawnmower is probably as close to zero emissions as you can get. If your electricity comes from coal or natural gas then there is a problem in the equation.

I am not railing against Black and Decker here, I applaud them for educating people about the dangers of gas-powered lawn tools, and encouraging the switch to cleaner options. The problem is that advertising zero emissions disconnects people from understanding how the energy system works.

It is misleads people into believing they are doing the right thing, and they are for the most part, but if you don’t understand that the production of electricity from coal and natural gas produces emissions, and yes natural gas is a far better option than coal, then it becomes challenging to encourage people to cut back their electricity consumption.

Our goal is reducing our energy consumption on individual and community level. We make choices every moment of the day that contribute to the solution or the problem. It makes sense switching from a gas-powered lawnmower to a battery or electric version, but be mindful of where your electricity comes from, because that matters.

There is another trap though in acquiring that knowledge. Getting power from cleaner sources like wind and solar should not be a free ticket to use as much as you want.

 

  

Related Posts SliderRelated Stories
The high price of low emissions – Part 6
Transportation contributes fewer than 30% of Canadian GHG emissions If governments seek to reduce national GHG emissions by a large amount, it is unlikely that much of the reductions can come ...
READ MORE
The high price of low emissions – Part 1
The benefits and costs of reducing greenhous gas in the transportation sector   Troy Media - by Ross McKittrick      Policymakers often hear calls to reduce private vehicle use and increase the ...
READ MORE
The high price of low emissions – Part 5
Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector Troy Media - by Ross Mckitrick I define an efficient reduction option as one that has a marginal cost of under $25 per ...
READ MORE
The high price of low emissions – Part 2
Emissions from heavy vehicles growing rapidly Troy Media - by Ross McKitrick     In 2009 Canada emitted 690 MtC of GHGs, of which 190 MtC, or 27.5 per cent, were from transportation-related ...
READ MORE
Photo: Courtesy of General Electric
  A new, more efficient waste recovery technology will allow a single compression station in northern Alberta to generate enough power for 14,000 homes without additional greenhouse gas emissions.     The project is ...
READ MORE
Dear Editor; I just finished live interview for OMNI TV for the reasons of these kinds of behaviours to emerge. The most obvious reason is we [immigrants] are highly populated in ...
READ MORE
Calgary-based Opsco Manufacturing announced recently it has contracted to design and fabricate a water removal skid package for the Alberta Carbon Trunk Line Project.   Alberta Carbon is the province’s first commercial ...
READ MORE
Calgary-based Matt Palmer is a film maker with a keen interest in energy and the environment.
Current energy systems unsustainable By Matt Palmer             Back at the end of April I wrote a five-part series called "The New Environmentalism". The goal was to express some ...
READ MORE
The high price of low emissions – Part
The high price of low emissions – Part
The high price of low emissions – Part
The high price of low emissions – Part
14,000 northern Alberta homes powered by new technology
Reader says anti-immigration posters in Forest Lawn a
Calgary-based Opsco Manufacturing building technology to reduce Alberta’s
The good, the bad, and the systems thinkers:

Tags: , ,

Category: Blogs, Energy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Tell your Story